Roami vs using ChatGPT or Claude on its own
A chat window vs. an agent with access to your archive, previews, and a publish gate.
At a glance
| A chat window alone | Roami + your agent | |
|---|---|---|
| Sees your archive | Only what you paste | Reads your posts, media and Search Console data |
| Writes into your CMS | You copy and paste | Creates and edits drafts directly |
| Bulk fixes | Manual | Audit, preview, approve, apply, re-audit |
| Memory between sessions | Limited | A fix list and ideas pipeline that persist |
| Can it publish? | n/a | Never |
Roami lists Claude, Cursor and Gemini as supported agents. ChatGPT's MCP write actions are in beta on Business, Enterprise and Edu plans; Pro is read-only. Prices and features checked 18 October 2026. They change; check the vendor’s page.
When a chat window is enough
One-off drafting, outlining, editing a paragraph.
When you need more
Anything that touches the whole archive: audits, links, metadata, alt text, finding queries that almost rank.
Start with connect your agent or the playbooks.
Free during beta. No card. Agents cannot publish.